Category: Life in General

Most Memorable Messages!

I thought it would be worth my while and yours to throw together a quick blog of my most memorable sermons. This is a list of sermons which, for the last ten years of my life, have for some reason or other been the most memorable to me. Be blessed as you listen to hear from the LORD!! Be sure to let me know your thoughts after listening!

S.M. Lockridge “That’s My King!”

[vimeo w=500&h=281]

That’s My King! from Albert Martin on Vimeo.

C.J. Mahaney on legalism “Enjoying Grace and Detecting Legalism”

C.J. Mahaney on modesty “The Soul of Modesty”

C.J. Mahaney “The Scream of the Damned”

[vimeo w=500&h=275]

The Scream of the Damned from Sovereign Grace Ministries on Vimeo.

John MacArthur on preaching “Preach the Word”

[vimeo w=500&h=300]

John MacArthur – Preach the Word from Randall Creasey on Vimeo.

Matt Chandler on the Gospel “Explicit Gospel”

[vimeo w=500&h=281]

The Explicit Gospel from Gospel Alliance New England on Vimeo.

Sam Storms on Jonathan Edwards on heaven “Joy’s Eternal Increase: Edwards on the Beauty of Heaven”

Mark Driscoll on Jesus “Is Jesus the Only God?”

Mark Driscoll on Men “Marriage and Men”

Mark Driscoll on Singleness “Single Like Jesus”

Mark Driscoll on Church Planting in the City”Church Planting in Corinth”

Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron on Evangelism “Hells Best Kept Secret”

[vimeo w=500&h=375]

Hell’s Best Kept Secret from Slide Forward on Vimeo.

Paul Washer on being a man “Be a Man…Biblically”

Ken Graves on Manning Up “Man Up”

[vimeo w=500&h=375]

Man Up Men’s Conference 3 of 3 – Pastor Ken Graves from Calvary Chapel Central Maine on Vimeo.

John Piper in Romans on God’s Glory “To Him Be Glory Forevermore”

John Piper on the Life and Ministry of Athanasius “Contending for Our All”

John Piper on Killing Sin “How to Kill Sin Part I and II”

John Piper on Missions “Doing Missions When Dying Is Gain”

Arturo Azurdia on the Doctrines of Grace

James MacDonald on Finding God’s Will “The Way of Wisdom Part I and II”

James McDonald on Philippians “I Choose Joy” Series (sorry this one isn’t free)

Tim Keller on Idolatry “Smashing False Idols: III Parts”

Voddie Baucham on the Bible “Why I Choose to Believe the Bible”


Voddie Baucham “The Supremacy of Christ and Truth in a Postmodern World”

[vimeo w=500&h=375]

The Supremacy of Christ and Truth in a Postmodern World from David Jimenez on Vimeo.

R.C. Sproul on “The Holiness of God” IV Parts


David Platt on the Christian Life “Radical Risk, Radical Reward”

[vimeo w=500&h=281]

Radical Risk, Radical Reward from Cross Church on Vimeo.

The Revival Hymn Preacher Compilation


Francis Chan on Love and Thinking



Why I Hate Religion but Love Jesus | Remixed, Uncut & Raw | Spoken Word

Check out our Rendition of “Why I Hate Religion but Love Jesus

Why I Hate Religion but Love Jesus | Remixed, Uncut & Raw | Spoken Word

Created by DOLPHINMedia

US Embassy Kiev Visa Interview | посольство СШ Киев интервью виза

A letter of complaint about the U.S. Consulate Services in Kiev

My name is Jacob Nelson.  My wife is a Ukrainian citizen born and raised in Odessa.  I am a U.S. Citizen.  We live in Odessa as Christian missionaries to Ukraine’s people.  Last week my wife applied for a B-2 non-immigrant visa so she could travel to the U.S. with me and meet my family for the first time and speak to our friends about how they can be involved in helping us and helping this country.  We love what we do and we like our lives in Odessa.  We have no desire or plan to live in another country, especially and including the U.S.

My wife was denied the Visa but in a pretty unprofessional and rude way.  Perhaps she does not have the rights of a U.S. Citizen, but your consulate representative did not conduct a fair, just, or objective interview with her this week when she applied for her visa.  Her first interview was Tuesday the 10th of January, 2012. The gentleman she spoke to was pretty kind.  However he did not believe what she said.  She did not realize this until after the interview was over.  She thought he was going to issue her the visa, but realized after the interview, he had asked her a few times why would I, her husband, quit fishing in Alaska and become a missionary.  I believe the issue at stake is not why I did it, but if I did, and in fact I have.  Perhaps it is hard for him to understand, but she told the truth of our lives and this is all she can do.  Honesty is an important part of our lives plus, we have read regarding visa interviews,

“Honesty is the best policy Honest and clear responses are the one that would help you secure VISA.  If you lie or make up things, there are high chances, that you would be denied VISA.  These are some items that can save you last minute troubles.  One thing to remember that U.S. Government have open doors policy and depend a lot on travelers’ clear and objective statements of purpose of travel.  And honesty would your best friend in this.”

She explained to him that becoming missionaries to Ukraine is what we have decided to do with our lives and that we recently completed a missionary training school in Odessa.  If she was telling the truth and their job is to evaluate people’s honesty, what does this say for them when an officer assesses this wrong?  Are they trained in this skill or is it left to the individuals’ personality, bias, or opinion alone?  Does it matter to anyone if they get it right, or if they even try at all to get it right?  I also understand that the officers are only human and cannot always accurately determine this correctly, the question in the air is, do they care about doing it correctly? because I and many others do not have the impression they do.  We also understand that it is assumed she is an intending immigrant.  She brought many documents to adhere by these suggestions:

“Applicants are welcome to present whatever information they feel demonstrates that they have strong economic, family or professional ties in their country of residence.  The consular officer will request to view such documents at his or her discretion.  Since each applicant’s situation is different, there is no “set” of documents that you can present that will guarantee visa issuance.”

The documents she had on hand were non-refundable round-trip plane tickets for my wife and I worth approx. $2,600, a statement from her university that she  is enrolled as a student there (as she is a fourth year student with one year to go), marriage certificate in Odessa, bank statements showing our cash for the trip, a letter of invitation and statement of affiliation with the missions agency we are with, proof of her partial ownership of a flat in Odessa, itinerary plans in the States, a copy of my missionary visa to Ukraine, and some miscellaneous items about our missions work and plans in Odessa.

Yes she was a bit nervous at the interview; of course a lot is on the line regarding the outcome.  So, when it was over she left pretty discouraged.  She was discouraged not only because the answer was a harsh no, but because of how condescending it is to be called a liar and treated with such disregard.  When we read in the papers she was given for the denial or when we read about the interview process on-line, it sounds very courteous, professional and concerned about the people applying, however in person her experience, and that of others there, was and is very often contrary to this.  What can you do when an officer has said no because you were not convincing enough in their opinion and you were telling the truth?  She thought perhaps she was not clear enough in some detail.  The main thing is she was told at the Embassy not to give him any documents unless the officer asks her for them.  This would leave you the impression that they are experts.  How can their expertise be assessed if their decisions are completely arbitrary with indifference to probing the details of an individuals’ situation?  This is also a little intimidating to find the amount of work you must go  through to gather all the documents only to have them brushed aside without even as much as a peak.  One would think they could at least patronize the papers, at minimum, for the outrageous interview fee we are paying them.  Afterwards I had the impression that the Embassy is more concerned about getting through as many people as they can, as fast as they can, without actually taking the time, as they claim to:

“…the consular officer looks at the applicant’s overall situation to determine whether he or she has overcome the legal presumption that he or she intends to immigrate.”

But what if they do not even look it over?  What if they are completely indifferent and lazy?  Should there not be some standard of protocols by which the officer is subject to?  They have all this power and no supervision.  Just because they are free by law to do as they please, or because there is no one watching them, does not make it right and does not mean that the law should be this way.  Should not the officer be accountable for the tactics they employ in making quality decisions regarding the applicant, or is it left completely up to their inadequate ability to determine facts in a very limited amount of time?  There should be some set criteria established and supervision done over these decisions, because these simple poorly trained people are abusing their power.  As United States representatives they should be conducting this foreign work with integrity.  As a U.S. Citizen I am utterly ashamed.  They automatically assume you are an intending immigrant until you prove otherwise, which means you are guilty until proven innocent.  This sounds closely akin to Stalin’s method of court justice and torture, where they got people to confess they were anti-Soviet spies when they weren’t.  On sight the consulate officer considers the applicant a liar.  If they try to speak or offer documents they can be interrupted or intentionally ignored, even if the officer can tell there may be lots of truth to the matter.

I realize there are dangerous things happening in the world with people leaving the country illegally.  I know that men are taking advantage of unsuspecting women and vice versa.  It would be a virtue to prevent these people from crossing the border.  There are also many other people attempting to migrate to the U.S. illegally, and the United States doesn’t owe anyone a visit to the U.S., and I agree that it seems justified to assume the interviewee is an intending immigrant, but what if you are not?  Is there any room for a benefit of the doubt?  My wife is not an intending immigrant, and if he didn’t believe her, how come he didn’t ask to see any documents?  Is it in the power and discretion of the officer to wield this kind of power in someone’s life, when they were paid a decent amount of money by me, for a small amount of time, to try and assess the situation clearly?  Are they concerned with doing their job well as representing the U.S government, or is it permissible to the federal government for the consulate to treat people lower because they are from another country? Are they to ask a few questions however related to the discovery of the truth or unrelated, make a decision based on a hunch, then hurry on to the next customer?

Since my wife and I knew that we are telling the truth, we decided to try one more time.  We gathered a few more documents, my Bible College degree and our missionary training certificates to show our past plans for ministry work, hopefully to add legitimacy to our claim to be missionaries.  We also gathered an invitation letter from my father, with a copy of his birth certificate, stating that he would take personal responsibility to ensure her return home and also we had a letter from our pastor in Odessa with an official stamp, stating that we were committed to an internship at our church in Odessa, July through December of 2012.  Our second interview was three days later, Friday, January 13th.

We spent a lot of time and care on preparing all these documents to never have them examined at either of the interviews.  The second consular officer was extremely harsh, rude, and inconsiderate to her. 

Hopefully you are able to see which officer helped her on that day in your computer system, because she was too distracted by the officers treatment of her to remember to get her name.  First thing she asked her was, what’s changed since she came on Tuesday, after saying very rudely, “you were just here”.  She explained she had new documents she didn’t have before.  The officer interrupted her before she could explain anything, which she would do a few different times for the length of time she was there at her window, which couldn’t have been more than one minute.  She interrupted her saying, “–it’s nothing’s changed!” and went on to her next “question”.

According to this:


No. The consular officer will reconsider a case if an applicant can show further convincing evidence of ties outside the United States.”

6. How can a Ukrainian citizen reapply for a visa once they have been denied?

A. Most visa applicants are found ineligible for U.S. visas under Section 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which is not a permanent ineligibility.  If, in a subsequent application, an applicant is able to convince the consular officer that he or she has no intention of abandoning his or her residence overseas, due to new evidence of strong ties not presented during his or her original application, or because his or her social, familial, or economic situation has changed in a way which strengthens his or her ties to his or her home country, he or she may be issued a visa.”

So, something did change.  As it says, “due to new evidence of strong ties not presented during his or her original application”, she did have a new letter of invitation from her father-in-law, which she clearly explained to her, which the officer promptly and completely ignored.  We also had a letter stating our internship intentions in Odessa.

She understood fairly quickly this woman was not interested in her or in really finding out what our situation is.  My wife showed her the receipt for our plane tickets in the window.  Completing the one minute interview the officer asked, “what are you doing…”  Valeriia barely got out a few words, “we are missionaries—“ when she saw her hit the button, which said, “NEXT”, before she could even finish her sentence.  She was trying to show her the letter from our pastor in Odessa when she just handed her the rejection form.  My wife asked her if she could show her our other documents.  She said, “no, it could be falsified!”  My wife asked her to take it and check it and she can find out that it is not falsified, which in fact they aren’t.  She simply said sharply, widening her eyes in a very unfriendly way, “no, I don’t want to!  Leave!”

What right does she have to treat someone like this?  Do the consulate officers really have this much power that they can deliberately neglect to do their job with tact and understanding for the applicants situation, not to mention their feelings, that they can do whatever they want and be accountable to no other authority?  If these people are making such important decisions in the lives of other people, shouldn’t they have exceptional people skills, and be at least half way interested in the person’s documents?  Should these people have this much power without being under some kind of regulations?

“Every alien shall be presumed to be an immigrant until he establishes to the satisfaction of the consular officer, at the time of application for admission, that he is entitled to a nonimmigrant status…

Applicants prove the existence of such residence by demonstrating that they have ties abroad that would compel them to leave the U.S. at the end of the temporary stay. The law places this burden of proof on the applicant.

Our consular officers have a difficult job. They must decide in a very short time if someone is qualified to receive a temporary visa. Most cases are decided after a brief interview and review of whatever evidence of ties an applicant presents.

Strong ties differ from country to country, city to city, individual to individual. Some examples of ties can be a job, a house, a family, a bank account. “Ties” are the various aspects of your life that bind you to your country of residence: your possessions, employment, social and family relationships.”

She offered Valeriia no opportunity to prove these ties.  We have ties in Ukraine through our church, ministry, partial flat ownership, University, her family, my  missionary visa, and our missionary agency.  Every time she spoke the officer interrupted her.  When she showed her the documents in the window she just waved them off.  Is there any way to address these types of issues in a way so that other people in the future can be treated with dignity and have paid the visa interview fee, for something more than condescending, accusatory, harassment?  I am sure the U.S. government or the officers’ superiors are as concerned about the quality of the consulate services as I and many others are.

Thank you to all recipients of this letter in its circulation for your concern and your help.   Is there anything else I can or should do to encourage reform in the unethical and biased system of some consulate offices?


If anyone feels they were mistreated by a U.S. Consulate officer they can write the Consulate General in their country, or write Washington D.C. to either of these addresses:

Office of International Operations
20 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Suite 3300
Washington, DC 20529


Director, Office of Internal Audit
425 I Street, NW
Room 3260
Washington, DC 20536

Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of State
Complaints can be made via telephone call, e-mail or standard mail regarding visa and passport malfeasance, employee misconduct, misuse of public position and related misconduct. Confidentiality over the Internet cannot be assured. Helpful information would be: What is the problem? Who is involved? When, where and why did it happen? Is there any documentation? Passport and visa issuance problems report first to Telephone Number: 202-663-1225.

Office of Inspector General (HOTLINE)
U.S. Department of State
P.O. Box 9778
Arlington, VA 22219 USA
Tel: 1-800-409-9926


Office of Inspector General
U.S. Department of State
Room 6817
Washington, DC 20520-6817 USA
Tel: 202-647-9450 Fax: 202-647-7660
Cables should be captioned: “OIG Channel-State” to ensure confidentiality

You can also send your letter to:

Consular Section
U.S. Embassy
5850 Kyiv Place
Department of State
Washington, D.C. 20521-5850

Consular Section
U.S. Embassy to Ukraine
vul. Mykoly Pymonenka 6
Kyiv 01901 Ukraine

In addition, you may also file a report or complaint by calling the OIG Hotline directly at 1.800.409.9926 or 1.202.647.3320.

You can also contact the U.S. Congressman in the State you intend to visit:

A Christmas Blog from Ukraine

It’s been one year, one month and thirty days since I crossed the Atlantic for the first time and placed my feet on Ukrainian soil.  Odessa is a charming city in its own right, hugging the Black Sea, hiding thousands of trees on the streets behind its many tall rectangular concrete buildings.  The center is always full of people walking down its cobblestone streets and quaintly covered alley ways.   The architecture is a unique blend of Mediterranean, Greek, French, Italian, and more.  The true blue Odessan people have a past influenced by survival, communism, Eastern Orthodoxy, wry humor, mobsters, corruption, Russia, Jews, and rural Ukrainian roots.  When I came here, at once I had been transported into a parallel dimension to a place I hadn’t a clue existed.  Never before had I imagined this world or even saw anything like it.

My wife says I still have culture shock.  I thought I was just being overly picky.  The customer service here is a far cry from five star, people push their way through the small crowded buses and if they see you coming don’t bother to step aside, and whether you’re driving down the rode or jostling your way to the cash register at McDonald’s its survival of the quickest in this territory.  These kinds of things test my nerves sometimes and as I examine the people behaving in what I consider outright rude, inconsiderate, or extremely selfish behavior, I am stunned at how indifferent they seem.  They could care less, and they care less so little, that they could care less that they care less about you – that’s how much they care less.  If someone gets out of their seat by the window on the ‘mashrutka’ (bus), the person by the isle will stay sitting there and force the next person sitting down to squeeze and step over them.  I came to the point where I had to come to terms with the mentality here, and while trying not to allow myself to follow suit and behave as though I am entitled to my seat, or unstepped on shoes, learn to be more gracious.  The best thing for me to do is swallow my own pride and display patience and kindness without judgment.  Being as I still notice and mention some of these things I guess one could say I’m not quite over my culture shock yet.

However, I am long past the honeymoon stage of the enchantment of this foreign place.  I suppose this lands me somewhere between the initial romance phase and the acceptance stage.  Although there are many things I still have yet to get used to, it is nice to get away from the materialistic “Disneyland we call America” (Piper).  For me it is an adventure of sorts, something different, something new.  Not to say capitalism and consumerism hasn’t crept into this country, but most people here are just a lot more broke.  At the store I have a lot smaller selection of all the luxuries I had in the States, although they have plenty of interesting things.  They make this dish here with cold chicken in a pie of cold jello (“holodec”)– still in culture shock on that one.  If you try to start a business here, they’ll tax you so hard you’ll have no money left over for your business, so you either need to pay some serious bribes or know somebody who can pull some strings.  At my wedding ceremony, my wife and I were the first ones down the isle, that’s just how they do it in Ukraine.  When we moved into our new flat I thought to bring a cake to our neighbors to be friendly but I was warned by a few people that that would not go over well.  The Baptists here are very different from what you’d call a Baptist in the States and from what I’ve learned their soteriology is very similar to Eastern Orthodox, which is unlike any western soteriology.  80% of the people here are wearing black shoes and black jackets and almost everyone has the same cookie cutter clothing style.  Their “e”’s sound like “ye” and they mix consonants at the front of words like “mn…” and “vch…”, etc.  All the ladies are taking the bus and walking long distances in pretty high heels or boots.  When you eat at the café you must pay for water, or sauce, and everything is in small portions, a la carte.  The cafes are not even cafes, they are restaurants.  They don’t have Starbuck’s here and their coffee cups are half the size I’m used to.  Most people eat and serve bread dry and I’ve always had at least butter.  The water heaters are much smaller so there’s no taking your time in a nice hot shower, it is always a race against the lukewarm downpour.  The water isn’t that clean also which means a couple walks to the well to fill up some jugs every month.  They don’t even have tortilla chips!

My wife and I, if it be the Lord’s will, have committed ourselves to serving here as missionaries for life.  As I think about Christmas and the family I may have in the future, it dawns on me that things in this country, my new home, are just a little bit different.  While Christmas may be the biggest holiday for us all-Americans, here it is New Years.  They celebrate Christmas on January 7th, Santa Clause is called Grandfather Frost and he has a granddaughter even with an unpronounceable name for me at this point.  Let me just say that I’ve never in my life had the perfect Christmas.  For the record, I love Christmas.  This goes to show that none of them need be perfect to be loved.  I won’t have those same kind of Christmases I had in America.  My children will celebrate Christmas with our immediate family on the 25th and with Lera’s folks, cousins, etc. on the 7th.  The point is this.  Life for me will never be the same.

God has been planning since before creation, to spread His Word all across the earth!  This aim is strategic, purposeful, powerful, and unstoppable.  God calls us to walk away from our comforts.  He calls us to lay down our traditions, our entitlements, and our ways.  Christmas is all about Jesus.  You know that.  Jesus came in the form of a man.  This is huge.  He was born.  He didn’t have to do it, but in it He is most glorified and we are most blessed.  He let go of all the comforts of Heaven and was born in a manger so you and I could have life and celebrate Christmas wherever we are in the world, celebrating the Incarnation every day.  This mission of His to earth brought about our redemption and is only one part of God’s plan to scour the globe.  He’s calling you and I to let go of some things and have the same mind that was in Him when He emptied Himself.  Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!  May this Christmas bring you much happiness and this year many things new!  And remember what Jesus said, if you lose your life for His sake and the Gospels, only then will you find it.

Thanksgiving 101


Just a video version of a slide show I prepared for English Club last Saturday.  English Club is an outreach we do, teaching people from the city English for free.  Many of them return week after week allowing us to build relationships with them.  I was thankful for the topic of Thanksgiving which gave me an excellent excuse to put a little God in the presentation.  They don’t celebrate this holiday in Ukraine of course.  Check it out if you have time.  There is some interesting Thanksgiving history I learned and spent many hours researching actually.  (Note: once the slides have been converted to video the animations aren’t as fancy as the presentation itself and I couldn’t figure out how to loop the music or use more than one song.  Perhaps I will figure it out in time.)  Be blessed!  Oh, and give thanks!